Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(21)2022 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36362731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since there is no available data on temporal trends of caesarean section (CS) rates in pregnant women with COVID-19 through the pandemic, we aimed to analyze the trends in caesarean section rate in a large cohort of pregnant women with COVID-19, according to the Robson Ten Group Classification System of deliveries. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled pregnant women with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who delivered in our center between March 2020 and November 2021. Deliveries were classified, according to the Robson group classification, and according to three time periods: (1) deliveries from March 2020 to December 2020; (2) deliveries from January 2021 to April 2021; (3) deliveries from May 2021 to November 2021. We compared pregnancy characteristics and incidence of caesarean section, according to the Robson category in the total population, and according to the three time periods. RESULTS: We included 457 patients matching the inclusion criteria in our analysis. We found that overall CS rate significantly decreased over time from period 1 to period 3 (152/222, 68.5% vs. 81/134, 60.4% vs. 58/101, 57.4%, χ2 = 4.261, p = 0.039). CS rate significantly decreased over time in Robson category 1 (48/80, 60% vs. 27/47,57.4% vs. 8/24, 33.3%, χ2 = 4.097, p = 0.043) and Robson category 3 (13/42, 31% vs. 6/33, 18.2% vs. 2/22, 9.1%, χ2 = 4.335, p = 0.037). We also found that the incidence of induction of labor significantly increased over time (8/222, 3.6% vs. 12/134, 9% vs. 11/101, 10.9%, χ2 = 7.245, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our data provide an overview of the temporal changes in the management and obstetric outcome of COVID-19 pregnant women through the pandemic, confirming that standards of obstetrical assistance for pregnancies complicated by SARS-CoV-2 infection improved over time.

2.
Fertil Steril ; 96(1): 214-9, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21645895

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives containing different progestogens on adiponectin and leptin serum levels. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, semi-randomized study. SETTING: General gynecology clinic of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Forty-five healthy postmenopausal and 45 healthy premenopausal women. INTERVENTION(S): Thirty postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either drospirenone (DRSP) 2 mg + E(2) 1 mg (n = 15) or norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg + E(2) 1 mg (n = 15). Thirty premenopausal women were randomized to receive either ethinilestradiol (EE) 0.020 mg + DRSP 3 mg (n = 15) or EE 0.020 mg + desogestrel 0.15 mg (n = 15). Furthermore, 15 postmenopausal and 15 premenopausal untreated women served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adiponectin and leptin serum levels before and after 6 months of hormonal therapy. RESULT(S): No significant differences in leptin levels were detected in any group after 6 months. Adiponectin levels were significantly reduced in the NETA + E(2) group and increased in the EE + DRSP group, while remaining unmodified in all other groups. CONCLUSION(S): Hormone replacement therapy with NETA, but not with DRSP, decreases serum adiponectin levels. Oral contraceptives containing DRSP increase serum adiponectin levels.


Asunto(s)
Adiponectina/sangre , Anticonceptivos Orales/farmacología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Leptina/sangre , Progestinas/farmacología , Adiponectina/agonistas , Adiponectina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Leptina/agonistas , Leptina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...